论隐性采访与舆论监督的伦理考量

由于多种原因,隐性采访被作为舆论监督的有效手段而日益被较多地使用着。考虑到正义的目的或良善的结果,人们往往会忽视对于手段是否正当的质疑,或者采取一种两害权衡取其轻的态度。然而事实上,既然手段是不正当的,目的也就不是正当的,不能为了正义的目的或良善的结果而滥用手段,否则,将会危及社会基本的诚信和公正秩序。     

基于灰色系统建模技术的人体疾病早期预测预警研究

传统健康体检主要通过对单次体检指标进行横向比较和静态分析,忽略个体差异,纯粹从指标高低来判断体检者健康状况与身体状态,难以及时发现体检者可能存在的疾病隐患。由于个体体检指标具有样本量小、信息不确定、数据类型异构、影响因素构成复杂等特征,传统以大样本为基础的数学模型均难以适应此类小数据系统的建模要求。为此,通过建立适用于人体主要指标趋势预测的灰色系统模型（简称HIGM（1,1）模型）,实现对人体主要健康指标的动态建模与趋势分析,从而可以掌握体检者未来一段时间身体指标的变化趋势及可能存在的疾病隐患。研究成果对提升体检效果、强化体检意义,促进灰色理论与现实问题的有效对接等方面,均具有积极意义。     

投资者保护公益组织与股东诉讼在中国的实践——基于中证投服证券支持诉讼的多案例研究

以2016~2017年间中证中小投资者服务中心(以下简称"中证投服")提起的4例证券支持诉讼为研究对象,本文深入分析了该组织在证券支持诉讼中的作用实现机理及其在中小投资者利益保护方面所产生的直接经济后果和溢出效应。本文发现:中证投服提起的证券支持诉讼在很大程度上改善了虚假陈述案件的赔偿机制,主要体现为赔付主体更加合理化,赔偿金额的计算更加科学,赔付比例有明显提升,赔偿款项的执行力度得以加强;在作用实现机理方面,中证投服作为投资者保护公益组织向中小股东提供了公益服务,同时又具备政府弹性监管的色彩,与我国现行的司法制度形成互补;更为重要的是,中证投服参与证券支持诉讼产生了显著的溢出效应,在唤醒中小股东维权意识的同时,明显提升了民间律师团体的活跃程度,进而从整体上极大地带动了民间股东诉讼的兴起。     

工业城市"三位一体"公共危机管理机制的建构

工业城市公共危机事件的频繁发生,表明我国已进入工业城市公共危机的高发期。因此,在工业城市中构建以政府为核心和基础、以企业和社区为条件和保证的“三位一体”的公共危机管理机制已经势在必行。     

生产要素理论的主要学派与最新发展

本文对经济学历史上产生的生产要素理论学派的主要观点进行了总结,对生产要素理论存在的不足之处进行了简要分析,并探讨了生产要素理论的最新发展,最后对生产要素六元论做了简评.     

社会主义社会的基本矛盾与构建和谐社会

社会主义生产关系与生产力的基本适应、社会主义上层建筑与社会主义经济基础的基本适应,是社会主义制度具有优越性、生命力的内在根据,为构建和谐社会奠定了经济、政治基础。社会主义制度具有解决自身矛盾的本质力量,是和谐社会能有生机活力的源泉。社会主义社会中,生产关系与生产力、上层建筑与经济基础之间还有不适应、不和谐的相互矛盾的方面,总体来看,这种矛盾是非对抗性的。构建和谐社会的科学概念是党的最高纲领与最低纲领的动态结合点,发挥构建和谐社会的政治驱动作用会推动社会主义事业朝着共产主义方向稳步前进。     

人口流动与迁移对城市收入分配的影响

随着我国城市化的快速发展,人口流动与迁移在城市社会生活中的影响日益突出,尽管从长期看,人口流动与迁移有利于优化资源配置和城市化发展,但从短期看则加剧了城市收入分配的分化,甚至使城市贫困问题更加严重.为此,应建立以公平为价值取向的城市综合公共政策体系,将流动人口问题纳入政策关注范畴,将城市公共福利水平作为考量政府执政能力的依据.     

Collaborative Frame Construction in Social Movement Campaigns: Bisphenol-A (BPA) and Scientist–Activist Mobilization

Previous research has explored the definitional features of the processes of scientific expert activism but has been less clear regarding the dynamics of this scientific activism. This paper addresses these gaps in understanding by using an exploration of the state-based efforts and mobilizations to regulate the chemical Bisphenol-A (BPA) to identify and analyze the dynamics of interactions between scientists and activists as they collaborate in pursuit of movement objectives. Drawing primarily from interview data and participant observation, I explore how scientific experts—through collaboration and work with activists—impact the processes of movement framing, and how, in turn, the collaborative dissemination of these frames may contribute to movement goals. I argue that the relationships and coordination that developed between BPA scientists and activists resulted in a collaboratively crafted set of frames that were both scientifically rigorous and highly resonant to a public audience.     

Breaking free from siloes: intersectionality as a collective action frame to address toxic exposures and reproductive health

ABSTRACT

There has been increasing interest in collaborative approaches between the environmental justice (EJ) and reproductive justice (RJ) movements to address the higher burden of toxic exposures and associated reproductive health outcomes in vulnerable communities. This study examined the collective action frames (CAFs) of advocates at the EJ/RJ nexus. CAFs highlight how advocates identify problems and solutions, and motivate action. The use of intersectionality was identified as a main CAF used in three key ways: breaking free from identity-based, issue-based, and movement-based siloes. First, interviewees described breaking free from identity-based siloes by identifying risks of toxic exposures that result from intersecting social locations (e.g. gender, race/ethnicity, income, immigration status) and by equally prioritizing multiple aspects of their identities as they engage in advocacy. Second, they described breaking free from issue-based siloes by developing multi-issue agendas that address a complex web of interrelated problems impacting health. Third, they described breaking free from movement-based siloes by developing cross-movement collaborations to address issues of mutual concern. Among multiple reasons given for cross-movement collaborations, advocates perceived them as valuable in order to disrupt social, political, and economic power imbalances that shape environmental reproductive health inequities, as well as other health and social inequities. Based on these findings, we suggest that intersectionality is a master frame, and thus may be useful to advocates in other social movements addressing intersectional issues. Understanding an intersectionality frame can help to inform advocacy approaches to promote health and health equity, particularly those focused on policies and structural drivers of health.